Family Portrait
Art Club 2000, Olaf Breuning, Louise Bourgeois, Dan Graham, Carol
Irving, Mathias Kessler, Dorothea Lange, Servane Mary, Claes
Oldenburg, Hans Op de Beeck
October 19–December 9, 2012 Opening: Friday, October 19, 6–8pm
carriage trade 62 Walker Street New
York, NY 10013 Hours: Thu–Sun, 1–6pm
www.carriagetrade.org
|
Share  |
|
As the subject of An American Family, one of television's first
reality shows, the Loud family exemplified the "Margaret Mead effect" of
the mediation of experience, where representation begins to influence
behavior. Followed everywhere by cameras for seven months, emotional cracks
and fissures developed from the constant surveillance, which peaked when
Pat Loud asked her husband for a divorce on TV.
Serving
as a vehicle to represent and reproduce the values of society, the family
is central to its psyche. Through television shows and advertisements,
popular culture has combined to represent the family as central to
"belonging," a unique group at the core of social obligation and order. The
presumption of social mobility in American society places the family at the
center of a set of highly ambiguous class relations. The "classless" nature
of democracy implies that the individual may prevail over any obstacle, and
is not subject to bias based on background or status. The obsession with
social status, on the other hand, suggests that pedigree, even if invented,
(Pygmalion, Trading Places) can help one "get ahead," though it
might mean jettisoning one's origins in favor of a new set of values and
norms.
Also providing an intimate social structure for
individuals without legal or biological links, the family model is
replicated in ways that adapt its deep emotional bonds while challenging
its moral imperative. The appropriation of a paternal figure as a leader in
cult organizations replicates social hierarchies borrowed from family
structures, with parallels found in mainstream politics. Ultimately a
projection of a kind of dependency of the weaker members on the
stronger, the impulse to trust a politician as a parental figure (Mitt
Romney's image seems drawn from a 1950s sitcom dad) can play an almost
unconscious role in campaigns.
Pulled in so many directions, the
family is unsurprisingly sometimes represented as torn apart. Exploited for
political agendas (the Defense of Marriage Act) as well as
commercial interests (family-centric ads selling security and trust), the
family unit is subject to the daily pressures of societal norms. Charged
with reinforcing the perennial values which maintain and even "save" it
from ever-new presumed threats (challenges to gender roles, or questions of
its social significance) the family is expected to maintain its hegemonic
role in providing new, qualified members to participate in the healthy
competition that comprises a capitalist democracy. As the original site for
narratives of ambition, competition, cooperation, and conflict, the family
remains unrivaled.
While the subject of the family has often
been approached within art and portraiture in ways that either emphasize
its traditional nature or attempt to counteract this tradition with
challenges to its conservative reputation, the emphasis of the exhibition
Family Portrait is on the manner in which the family's image has
been constructed and maintained over time, and how this might influence the
shaping of the political and social spheres of everyday life.
|